Legislatures and Parliaments in Comparative Context
نویسنده
چکیده
The words “legislature” and “parliament” are often used interchangeably. The distinction between them, however, can be used to structure the analysis of legislatures and/or parliaments in a comparative context. Legislatures legislate; they pass laws. The notion of a “legislature” is thus located firmly in the classical view of a separation of powers between legislature, executive and judiciary. This distinguishes law-making both from the business of government and from the interpretation, adjudication and enforcement of any laws that are made. A “parliament”, on the other hand, does legislate but in contemporary politics is also something much more than a legislature. In the constitutional structure of “parliamentary government” that characterizes most European states, as well as “European-style” modern democracies such as Australia, Canada and New Zealand, the executive is constitutionally responsible to the legislature. The matter of whether or not the executive is responsible to the law-making body lies at the heart of my distinction between a “legislature” and a “parliament”. Parliamentary elections are in essence about choosing governments, not law-makers. This in turn creates distinctive incentives for elected politicians, who must remain loyal to political parties if they want to get into government, while heads of government often have discretion over the strategic timing of parliamentary elections. Under a seperation-of-powers regime, legislative elections have no effect on the identity of the government, although they have an impact on what the government is able to do. This affects the incentive structure of politicians, whose loyalty to political parties, for example, becomes more of an open question. Thus I use the distinction between legislatures and parliaments, a distinction between two very different types of politics, to structure the discussions that follow. I begin in the next section by looking at parliamentary politics, before moving on to look at legislative politics in separation of powers regimes. I conclude by revisiting this distinction in the context of the different types of empirical technique we can use to measure the policy positions of elected politicians.
منابع مشابه
Parliamentary Voting Procedures in Comparison
Increasingly, scholars of legislative politics propose comparative analyses of parliamentary voting behavior across different countries and parliaments. Yet parliamentary voting procedures differ dramatically across parliamentary chambers and ignoring these differences may, in the extreme, lead to meaningless comparisons. In this paper we present a first glimpse at a comprehensive data collecti...
متن کاملDelegation of Powers and the Fiduciary Principle
No more serious pitfall threatens the student of the European Union than the idea of assessing the EU’s institutions and decision processes using the same criteria that are relevant at the national level. For example, in spite of several superficial analogies, one cannot understand the European Parliament using the same conceptual categories which have proved useful in analyzing national parlia...
متن کاملA Dynamic Model of Legislative Bargaining
We prove existence of stationary Markov perfect equilibria in an infinite-horizon model of legislative bargaining in which the policy outcome in one period determines the status quo in the next. We allow for a multidimensional policy space and arbitrary smooth stage utilities. We prove that all such equilibria are essentially in pure strategies and that proposal strategies are differentiable al...
متن کاملThe Law of k/n: The Effect of Chamber Size on Government Spending in Bicameral Legislatures
Recent work in political economics has examined the positive relationship between legislative size and spending, which Weingast et al. (1981) formalized as the law of 1/n. However, empirical tests of this theory have produced a pattern of divergent findings. The positive relationship between seats and spending appears to hold consistently for unicameral legislatures and for upper chambers in bi...
متن کاملAdding Value? the Role of Second Chambers
In the study of legislatures, little attention is given to the second chambers of bicameral parliaments. We know something about some second chambers, most notably the US Senate, but relatively little is known about second chambers as a particular species of institution. To some extent, this is attributable to their perceived subordinate status. They are second chambers. In bicameral systems, r...
متن کامل